When We Were Old

 

Tempus Fugit.

 

 

 

For a decade I worked at a crystal warehouse. It was the most incredible learning experience and also energetically extraordinarily powerful. To say crystals hold energy is an understatement. There was much debate within the ‘crystal world’ whether the sudden outpouring of crystals on a global scale was a good thing or a rape of the earth but I think the energy has played a big part in the consciousness shift. As far as the current state of Ascension goes, they also hold cellular memory.

Memory seeds.

From Quartz-Lemurian seed crystals

Lemurian Seed Crystals : Are regarded as the most powerful of the healing quartz family, they allow connection to the ancient masters and lost civilisations of Lemuria, Mu and Atlantis, recorded by many to awaken dormant gene memories giving access to an ancient understanding of creation and universal composition, allowing the healer to see past the physical make up of reality.

 

From Lemurian seed meaning :

Lemurian Quartz is similar to normal Quartz except that it contains much more historic energy. Embedded in Lemurian Quartz is usually a horizontal line of fragments which are commonly referred to as “memories”. The information within each point contains powerful energies.

 

 

 

Over the last couple of years I’ve been remembering lost memories down in the memory bank of my life or lives which is where it gets totally confusing but that is what it is saying. A crack in time somewhere down the line. Another element in the mix is that the memories, even though they are remembered in this lifetime maybe far older than this lifetime(s). All sorts hold cellular memory. One big memory seed is music and leads into another area which is if the world is purely 3D how is it possible to connect energetically in a very real way from thousands of miles away. It maybe on ‘Another Plane’ but if we are separate bodies and minds and hearts how can we join ?

Also within the Self there are barriers and defences to regaining these memories as well. It seems memory and the connections are linked in some way. We are remembering each other.

 

 

A common phrase used within spiritual circles is ‘We are spiritual beings having a human experience’. Actually I would say the reality is we are ‘We are spiritual beings having a spiritual experience’. You just don’t know it until you do.

And some helpful quotes. The first ‘Never explain’ quote is probably useful for all life but becomes a necessity when you walk the spiritual path. When they just don’t get you. On a wing and a prayer and shit or bust.

 

 

 

 

All sorts have come up recently. Reality would appear to be so different from how we imagine it. It can be very confusing and frustrating and weird beyond belief to our human 3D mind. What I have found even more frustrating is there is a part of ‘Us’ which seems to understand what is going on even though consciously we may only have half the picture.

And the Observer effect. I found a good website which discusses ‘2001 A Space Odyssey’. My interest is connected with Frank and Dave and also 2001 in general. Kubrick’s movies seems to be making a point about The Observer. In the article the author said one reading of a scene in 2001 could be construed as saying there was another player apart from Hal, Frank and Dave. And fits with ‘The Analyst’ as Elena described him or her or it and the sense of being watched and someone always looking over your shoulder at what you are doing.

From Idyllopus.com :

‘Again, we must consider “who” is filming Dave and Frank for the interview. Is it HAL? We are likely intended to assume so, but we have three different angles here with the medium shot and the two close up shots of Dave and Frank in the interview. Later, in shot 335, we will be explicitly shown the area opposite the computer console. Frank and Dave are dialoguing in the interview as if there is not only a camera there but also a video screen nearby it upon which they are seeing a transmission of the interviewer, for they appear to be looking at that screen, at the interviewer, rather than at a camera.

If they were talking with the interviewer via only a supposed camera, they would be looking directly at the camera, but they aren’t, they are looking to the side of the camera. But when we see the area opposite in shot 335 we will see there is no such screen and I don’t view a camera either. Yet Kubrick keeps the interviewer in an “interviewing” space. The interviewer is shown with one fixed studio camera, whereas Dave and Frank are not–there is the medium shot and the close-ups of each. If the audience unquestioningly accepts this then they will unquestioningly gloss over other peculiarities in the film, just as they do with symphonies of oddities in The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut.’

 

 

Also the photographer / observer in ‘Oh What A Lovely War’ is saying the same.

 

 

Which leads into God. All roads lead to God. There is only one war going on which somehow manifests out there and that is the the ‘ego mind’ fight with God which wants to destroy and usurp God.

In the real world what God creates is for all time. There is only one problem which is the imagined separation from God and one answer which is to wake up from the dream of separation. IMO.

And it’s a paradox.

 

 

When we were old, we were young.

 

8 thoughts on “When We Were Old

  1. I concocted this for the article. Even this is inadequate. Probably best we’ve got though.

    Revelation is intensely personal and cannot be meaningfully translated. That is why any attempt to describe it in words is impossible. Revelation induces only experience. Revelation is literally unspeakable because it is an experience of unspeakable love.

    ‘When we were old, we were young.’ Tempus fugit.

    Like

  2. Frank, re: your ‘regression’. Did you know that ‘regression’ is a Machine Learning term? It refers to a type of ML problem that requires an allegory-rhythm to make a prediction from a set of continuous variables, as opposed to a classification problem where the ‘learner’ has to select the correct label for an input given a list of possible options. Regression is a type of supervised learning. Or to put it another way, regression is a form of ‘guided’ learning. Anyway, I couldn’t help but note that with “never explain yourself” you’ve only gone and ‘classified’ yourself. Again.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Orlena Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.